The world is on the cusp of a revolution that will revolutionize the conventional views about the economy, markets, banking, and credit, and this upheaval is just around the corner. The growth in the number of technological enterprises will be the driving force behind the shifts. In order to make the most of the dominance that the IT company will have in the future, it is vital to make active investments in the company.

A new cluster of companies that have high financial capabilities, a strong and promising business, unlimited monopoly in their respective segments, and ambitious leaders who are able to literally change the world have formed in the world. These companies have the potential to make a significant impact on the world. What Steve Jobs most likely envisioned for the future was something much grander than an iPhone in every pocket or a computer in every home.

The following are some of the distinguishing characteristics of high-tech organizations today: a large amount of cash on hand, virtually no outstanding debt, and a good and consistent flow of capital from the company’s primary line of business all contribute to a low likelihood of new competitors entering the market. Because one hundred percent of the competitors could be bought, or “standing,” as they say, continual advancement of technology, the majority of the new solutions, know-how, innovative goods, and software goes to a small group of businesses.

worldwide presence that is more informational and technological in nature than physical in nature.

These aspects of the global technological giantysm are practically independent of national governments, financial institutions, or anyone else! These businesses already hold a significant, albeit not entirely evident, portion of global dominance; in point of fact, they probably have a wonderful future ahead of them. If you want to make any changes to this situation, it may be too late.

At a time when a) more and more wealth is public (the internet, cellular communications, programming), and b) more and more wealth is intangible (content and software, communications, electronic money), there is no chance for anyone, with the exception of the leaders of the IT-segment, to preserve the advantages that they enjoyed in the era before computers.

The first victim is the government.

despite its widespread use, the phrase “revolution of Facebook” does not appear to have been claimed by any party as having copyright to it. However, it is widely believed that participants in the events’ coordination through social networks contributed significantly to the success of several revolutions that took place in 2011 (including those in Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya, amongst others).

Another illustration would be the right to access information. Since everyone has access to the internet, attempts by the government to prevent them from losing control of the media appear to be fruitless. People in Russia have lost faith in the government-controlled media and have turned their attention to the internet as a result. The government is no longer able to conceal information (take WikiLeaks as an example), they are unable to consolidate the masses, and they are unable to regulate the formation of new social organizations (previously – “parties” obsolete.).

The state and the government no longer have a monopoly on the dissemination of information, on propagandizing citizens, or on brainwashing them. They have now lost a substantial portion of the government due to the departure of these individuals. It is however a fallacy to believe that this authority has been eradicated completely; rather, it has merely been shifted from the hands of the government into the hands of corporations that dominate the network media. Earlier, the state reaped the benefits of its control over the information in the form of increased money flows; today, that benefit is being reaped by a multinational Internet corporation.